Updated SCS-C02 Test Cram | New SCS-C02 Test Vce

Blog Article

Tags: Updated SCS-C02 Test Cram, New SCS-C02 Test Vce, Reliable Study SCS-C02 Questions, SCS-C02 Download, SCS-C02 Exam Papers

DOWNLOAD the newest Prep4away SCS-C02 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tUZrOw2NVO42vxmFdKMjuhP-Jgu-LLTh

Learning knowledge is not only to increase the knowledge reserve, but also to understand how to apply it, and to carry out the theories and principles that have been learned into the specific answer environment. The AWS Certified Security - Specialty exam dumps are designed efficiently and pointedly, so that users can check their learning effects in a timely manner after completing a section. Our SCS-C02 test material is updating according to the precise of the real exam. Our AWS Certified Security - Specialty exam dumps will help you to conquer all difficulties you may encounter.

Amazon SCS-C02 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Identity and Access Management: The topic equips AWS Security specialists with skills to design, implement, and troubleshoot authentication and authorization mechanisms for AWS resources. By emphasizing secure identity management practices, this area addresses foundational competencies required for effective access control, a vital aspect of the certification exam.
Topic 2	Threat Detection and Incident Response: In this topic, AWS Security specialists gain expertise in crafting incident response plans and detecting security threats and anomalies using AWS services. It delves into effective strategies for responding to compromised resources and workloads, ensuring readiness to manage security incidents. Mastering these concepts is critical for handling scenarios assessed in the SCS-C02 exam.
Topic 3	Infrastructure Security: Aspiring AWS Security specialists are trained to implement and troubleshoot security controls for edge services, networks, and compute workloads under this topic. Emphasis is placed on ensuring resilience and mitigating risks across AWS infrastructure. This section aligns closely with the exam's focus on safeguarding critical AWS services and environments.
Topic 4	Data Protection: AWS Security specialists learn to ensure data confidentiality and integrity for data in transit and at rest. Topics include lifecycle management of data at rest, credential protection, and cryptographic key management. These capabilities are central to managing sensitive data securely, reflecting the exam's focus on advanced data protection strategies.
Topic 5	Security Logging and Monitoring: This topic prepares AWS Security specialists to design and implement robust monitoring and alerting systems for addressing security events. It emphasizes troubleshooting logging solutions and analyzing logs to enhance threat visibility.

>> Updated SCS-C02 Test Cram <<

100% Pass Quiz 2025 Amazon SCS-C02: AWS Certified Security - Specialty – High-quality Updated Test Cram

Good product can was welcomed by many users, because they are the most effective learning tool, to help users in the shortest possible time to master enough knowledge points, so as to pass the qualification test, and our SCS-C02 study materials have always been synonymous with excellence. Our SCS-C02 Study Materials can help users achieve their goals easily, regardless of whether you want to pass various qualifying examinations, our products can provide you with the learning materials you want.

Amazon AWS Certified Security - Specialty Sample Questions (Q329-Q334):

NEW QUESTION # 329
A security team is developing an application on an Amazon EC2 instance to get objects from an Amazon S3 bucket. All objects in the S3 bucket are encrypted with an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed key. All network traffic for requests that are made within the VPC is restricted to the AWS infrastructure. This traffic does not traverse the public internet.
The security team is unable to get objects from the S3 bucket
Which factors could cause this issue? (Select THREE.)

A. The security group that is attached to the EC2 instance is missing an inbound rule from the S3 managed prefix list over port 443.
B. The IAM instance profile that is attached to the EC2 instance does not allow the s3 ListBucket action to the S3: bucket in the AWS accounts.
C. The security group that is attached to the EC2 instance is missing an outbound rule to the S3 managed prefix list over port 443.
D. The KMS key policy that encrypts the object in the S3 bucket does not allow the kms Decrypt action to the EC2 instance profile ARN.
E. The I AM instance profile that is attached to the EC2 instance does not allow the s3 ListParts action to the S3; bucket in the AWS accounts.
F. The KMS key policy that encrypts the object in the S3 bucket does not allow the kms; ListKeys action to the EC2 instance profile ARN.

Answer: B,C,D

Explanation:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/security-group-rules.html To get objects from an S3 bucket that are encrypted with a KMS customer managed key, the security team needs to have the following factors in place:
* The IAM instance profile that is attached to the EC2 instance must allow the s3:GetObject action to the S3 bucket or object in the AWS account. This permission is required to read the object from S3. Option A is incorrect because it specifies the s3:ListBucket action, which is only required to list the objects in the bucket, not to get them.
* The KMS key policy that encrypts the object in the S3 bucket must allow the kms:Decrypt action to the EC2 instance profile ARN. This permission is required to decrypt the object using the KMS key. Option D is correct.
* The security group that is attached to the EC2 instance must have an outbound rule to the S3 managed prefix list over port 443. This rule is required to allow HTTPS traffic from the EC2 instance to S3 within the AWS infrastructure. Option E is correct. Option B is incorrect because it specifies the s3:ListParts action, which is only required for multipart uploads, not for getting objects. Option C is incorrect because it specifies the kms:ListKeys action, which is not required for getting objects. Option F is incorrect because it specifies an inbound rule from the S3 managed prefix list, which is not required for getting objects. Verified References:
* https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/UsingKMSEncryption.html
* https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/developerguide/control-access.html
* https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-endpoints-s3.html

NEW QUESTION # 330
An AWS account administrator created an IAM group and applied the following managed policy to require that each individual user authenticate using multi-factor authentication:

After implementing the policy, the administrator receives reports that users are unable to perform Amazon EC2 commands using the AWS CLI.
What should the administrator do to resolve this problem while still enforcing multi-factor authentication?

A. Implement federated API/CLI access using SAML 2.0, then configure the identity provider to enforce multi-factor authentication.
B. Change the value of aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent to true.
C. Instruct users to run the aws sts get-session-token CLI command and pass the multi-factor authentication
--serial-number and --token-code parameters. Use these resulting values to make API/CLI calls.
D. Create a role and enforce multi-factor authentication in the role trust policy. Instruct users to run the sts assume-role CLI command and pass --serial-number and --token-code parameters. Store the resulting values in environment variables. Add sts:AssumeRole to NotAction in the policy.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Instruct users to run the aws sts get-session-token CLI command and pass the multi-factor authentication --serial-number and --token-code parameters. Use these resulting values to make API/CLI calls.
According to the AWS documentation1, the aws sts get-session-token CLI command returns a set of temporary credentials for an AWS account or IAM user. The credentials consist of an access key ID, a secret access key, and a security token. These credentials are valid for the specified duration only. The session duration for IAM users can be between 15 minutes and 36 hours, with a default of 12 hours.
You can use the --serial-number and --token-code parameters to provide the MFA device serial number and the MFA code from the device. The MFA device must be associated with the user who is making the get-session-token call. If you do not provide these parameters when your IAM user or role has a policy that requires MFA, you will receive an Access Denied error.
The temporary security credentials that are returned by the get-session-token command can then be used to make subsequent API or CLI calls that require MFA authentication. You can use environment variables or a profile in your AWS CLI configuration file to specify the temporary credentials.
Therefore, this solution will resolve the problem of users being unable to perform EC2 commands using the AWS CLI, while still enforcing MFA.
The other options are incorrect because:
* A. Changing the value of aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent to true will not work, because this is a condition key that is evaluated by AWS when a request is made. You cannot set this value manually in your policy or request. You must provide valid MFA information to AWS for this condition key to be true.
* C. Implementing federated API/CLI access using SAML 2.0 may work, but it requires more operational effort than using the get-session-token command. You would need to configure a SAML identity provider and trust relationship with AWS, and use a custom SAML client to request temporary
* credentials from AWS STS. This solution may also introduce additional security risks if the identity provider is compromised.
* D. Creating a role and enforcing MFA in the role trust policy may work, but it also requires more operational effort than using the get-session-token command. You would need to create a role for each user or group that needs to perform EC2 commands, and specify a trust policy that requires MFA. You would also need to grant the users permission to assume the role, and instruct them to use the sts assume-role command instead of the get-session-token command.
References:
1: get-session-token - AWS CLI Command Reference

NEW QUESTION # 331
A company has hundreds of AWS accounts in an organization in AWS Organizations. The company operates out of a single AWS Region. The company has a dedicated security tooling AWS account in the organization. The security tooling account is configured as the organization's delegated administrator for Amazon GuardDuty and AWS Security Hub. The company has configured the environment to automatically enable GuardDuty and Security Hub for existing AWS accounts and new AWS accounts.
The company is performing control tests on specific GuardDuty findings to make sure that the company's security team can detect and respond to security events. The security team launched an Amazon EC2 instance and attempted to run DNS requests against a test domain, example.com, to generate a DNS finding. However, the GuardDuty finding was never created in the Security Hub delegated administrator account.
Why was the finding was not created in the Security Hub delegated administrator account?

A. VPC flow logs were not turned on for the VPC where the EC2 instance was launched.
B. Cross-Region aggregation in Security Hub was not configured.
C. The VPC where the EC2 instance was launched had the DHCP option configured for a custom OpenDNS resolver.
D. The GuardDuty integration with Security Hub was never activated in the AWS account where the finding was generated.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Note: GuardDuty only processes DNS logs if you use the default VPC DNS resolver. All other types of DNS resolvers won't generated DNS based findings.
https://repost.aws/knowledge-center/guardduty-finding-types

NEW QUESTION # 332
A company has two VPCs in the same AWS Region and in the same AWS account Each VPC uses a CIDR block that does not overlap with the CIDR block of the other VPC One VPC contains AWS Lambda functions that run inside a subnet that accesses the internet through a NAT gateway. The Lambda functions require access to a publicly accessible Amazon Aurora MySQL database that is running in the other VPC A security engineer determines that the Aurora database uses a security group rule that allows connections from the NAT gateway IP address that the Lambda functions use. The company's security policy states that no database should be publicly accessible.
What is the MOST secure way that the security engineer can provide the Lambda functions with access to the Aurora database?

A. Move the Lambda functions into a public subnet in their VPC Move the Aurora database into a private subnet in its VPC Configure the Lambda functions to use the Aurora database's new private IP address to access the database Configure the Aurora database to allow access from the public IP addresses of the Lambda functions
B. Establish an AWS Direct Connect interface between the VPCs Configure the Lambda functions to use a new route table that accesses the Aurora database through the Direct Connect interface Configure the Aurora database's security group to allow access from the Direct Connect interface IP address
C. Establish a VPC endpoint between the two VPCs in the Aurora database's VPC configure a service VPC endpoint for Amazon RDS In the Lambda functions' VPC.
configure an interface VPC endpoint that uses the service endpoint in the Aurora database's VPC Configure the service endpoint to allow connections from the Lambda functions.
D. Move the Aurora database into a private subnet that has no internet access routes in the database's current VPC Configure the Lambda functions to use the Aurora database's new private IP address to access the database Configure the Aurora databases security group to allow access from the private IP addresses of the Lambda functions

Answer: C

Explanation:
This option involves creating a VPC Endpoint between the two VPCs that allows private communication between them without going through the internet or exposing any public IP addresses. In this option, a VPC endpoint for Amazon RDS will be established, and an interface VPC endpoint will be created that points to the service endpoint in the Aurora database's VPC. This way, the Lambda functions can use the private IP address of the Aurora database to access it through the VPC endpoint without exposing any public IP addresses or allowing public internet access to the database.

NEW QUESTION # 333
A company has hundreds of AWS accounts in an organization in AWS Organizations. The company operates out of a single AWS Region. The company has a dedicated security tooling AWS account in the organization.
The security tooling account is configured as the organization's delegated administrator for Amazon GuardDuty and AWS Security Hub. The company has configured the environment to automatically enable GuardDuty and Security Hub for existing AWS accounts and new AWS accounts.
The company is performing control tests on specific GuardDuty findings to make sure that the company's security team can detect and respond to security events. The security team launched an Amazon EC2 instance and attempted to run DNS requests against a test domain, example.com, to generate a DNS finding. However, the GuardDuty finding was never created in the Security Hub delegated administrator account.
Why was the finding was not created in the Security Hub delegated administrator account?

A. The VPC where the EC2 instance was launched had the DHCP option configured for a custom OpenDNS resolver.
B. VPC flow logs were not turned on for the VPC where the EC2 instance was launched.
C. The GuardDuty integration with Security Hub was never activated in the AWS account where the finding was generated.
D. Cross-Region aggregation in Security Hub was not configured.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The GuardDuty integration with Security Hub was never activated in the AWS account where the finding was generated.
The reason is that Security Hub does not automatically receive findings from GuardDuty unless the integration is activated in each AWS account. According to the AWS documentation1, "The Amazon GuardDuty integration with Security Hub enables you to send findings from GuardDuty to Security Hub. Security Hub can then include those findings in its analysis of your security posture." However, this integration is not enabled by default and requires manual activation in each AWS account. The documentation1 also states that
"You must activate the integration in each AWS account that you want to send findings from GuardDuty to Security Hub." Therefore, even though the company has configured the security tooling account as the delegated administrator for GuardDuty and Security Hub, and has enabled these services for existing and new AWS accounts, it still needs to activate the GuardDuty integration with Security Hub in each account. Otherwise, the findings from GuardDuty will not be sent to Security Hub and will not be visible in the delegated administrator account.
The other options are incorrect because:
* A. VPC flow logs are not required for GuardDuty to generate DNS findings. GuardDuty uses VPC flow logs as one of the data sources for network connection findings, but not for DNS findings. According to the AWS documentation2, "GuardDuty uses VPC Flow Logs as a data source for network connection findings."
* B. The VPC DHCP option configured for a custom OpenDNS resolver does not affect GuardDuty's ability to generate DNS findings. GuardDuty uses DNS logs as one of the data sources for DNS findings, regardless of the DNS resolver used by the VPC. According to the AWS documentation2,
"GuardDuty uses DNS logs as a data source for DNS activity findings."
* D. Cross-Region aggregation in Security Hub is not relevant for this scenario, since the company operates out of a single AWS Region. Cross-Region aggregation in Security Hub allows you to aggregate security findings from multiple Regions into a single Region, where you can view and
* manage them. However, this feature is not needed if the company only uses one Region. According to the AWS documentation3, "Cross-Region aggregation enables you to aggregate security findings from multiple Regions into a single Region."

NEW QUESTION # 334
......

Choosing our SCS-C02 exam quiz will be a wise decision that you make, because this decision may have a great impact in your future development. Having the certificate may be something you have always dreamed of, because it can prove that you have certain strength. Our SCS-C02 exam questions can provide you with services with pretty quality and help you obtain a certificate. Our SCS-C02 Learning Materials are made after many years of practical efforts and their quality can withstand the test of practice. And you will obtain the SCS-C02 certification just for our SCS-C02 study guide.

New SCS-C02 Test Vce: https://www.prep4away.com/Amazon-certification/braindumps.SCS-C02.ete.file.html

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Prep4away SCS-C02 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tUZrOw2NVO42vxmFdKMjuhP-Jgu-LLTh

Report this page

UPDATED SCS-C02 TEST CRAM | NEW SCS-C02 TEST VCE

Updated SCS-C02 Test Cram | New SCS-C02 Test Vce